Despite Legal Threats, Live Action Refuses to Back Down on Truth About Abortion

The battle over language is intensifying, as the pro-life organization Live Action has firmly rejected a legal demand to stop describing abortion as “killing.” The organization, led by Lila Rose, is facing a cease-and-desist letter from Amplify Legal, a group that claims Live Action has defamed women who have undergone the procedure.

Amplify Legal, which acts as the litigation arm for the organization Abortion in America, Founded by former Planned Parenthood leader Cecile Richards, alleges that Live Action published defamatory accounts involving 13 of its clients. However, Live Action maintains that these individuals had already placed their stories into the public sphere.

The conflict highlights the deep-seated ideological divide in American culture regarding the sanctity of life. Amplify Legal reportedly receives backing from the Hopewell Fund, which is tied to prominent far-left donors.

Peter Breen, executive vice president and head of litigation at the Thomas More Society, which is representing Live Action, framed the legal threat as an infringement on fundamental free speech. Speaking on “Washington Watch,” Breen addressed the discomfort surrounding the terminology.

“Of course, it’s an uncomfortable word,” Breen said. “But what are you doing in an abortion? You are killing a living human being. Uncomfortable, but certainly true. And [it is] well within the First Amendment rights of Live Action and any pro-life group to be able to use that word and say very clearly that abortion is killing.”

In a formal response delivered by the Thomas More Society, Live Action declared it would not capitulate to the demands. The organization stated it will not retract its coverage, delete its archives, or subject its future reporting to outside oversight. The statement affirmed that Live Action will continue to express the conviction—shared by millions of Americans—that abortion ends a human life and is accurately defined as “killing.”

The controversy touches on cases where abortion has been used for political messaging. Specifically, the articles in question included discussions of individuals like Kate Cox, who gained national attention after traveling out of Texas for an abortion and later attending the State of the Union address as a guest of First Lady Jill Biden.

Analysts argue that the attempt to sanitize language around abortion ignores the moral reality of the procedure. Joy Stockbauer, a policy analyst for the Family Research Council’s Center for Human Dignity, emphasized that the biological reality of life is immutable. “Avoiding certain terms because they make you uncomfortable doesn’t change the reality of what you’re doing when you commit or undergo an abortion,” she observed.

For now, the legal standoff remains firm. Breen compared the situation to a schoolyard confrontation, asserting that bowing to such pressure would only encourage further silencing of pro-life voices. Live Action has made it clear that if the case proceeds to court, they are prepared to defend their reporting as a matter of journalistic integrity and truth.

Thank you for your support.

If you appreciate the work we do to spread the good news of Jesus Christ, please consider giving a gift to help us continue this work. Maranatha!