Did Truist Bank Reject LGBT Activism?

For years, American banks have been one of the last holdouts in the corporate DEI machine but that’s starting to crack.

 

Truist Bank has announced it will no longer participate in the Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate Equality Index and for a company that ran up a perfect 100% score year after year, that’s not a minor policy tweak, that’s a public repudiation.

 

The move came after the Heritage Foundation filed a shareholder proposal demanding the bank account for the business risks of ideological misalignment with its own customers.

 

The HRC index is worth understanding for what it actually demands. Companies don’t earn high scores by simply treating employees fairly. They earn them by covering gender-transition surgeries, lobbying for LGBTQ legislation, forcing staff through repeated ideological training, throwing open single-sex restrooms, and recruiting based on sexual orientation rather than qualifications.

 

A perfect score doesn’t mean a company is tolerant but that it has been fully captured. The numbers confirm the tide is turning, however. In 2025, 377 Fortune 500 companies participated in the index, but in 2026, that number collapsed to 131, a 65% drop. The figures give us proof that companies aren’t quietly distancing themselves anymore but walking out the door.

 

Jerry Bowyer of Bowyer Research, whose firm represents shareholder interests against activist-driven corporate policy, says the Truist decision is “really astonishing,” particularly for a major financial institution. Stephen Soukup of the Heritage Foundation also said that “The Human Rights Campaign is losing what remains of its relevance” and that “the spell is broken. Corporate fear of the HRC is dead.”

 

What’s notable isn’t just that Truist walked away from the HRC but that they did so while pushing back on other shareholder demands. Truist’s selective concession speaks volumes about where the organization now stands in corporate circles.

 

The rot of slow creep is real, and whilst the index started as a basic anti-discrimination framework, the goalposts moved dramatically: from bathroom access to gender ideology in benefits packages to compelled speech in the workplace.

 

Companies signed on when it seemed safe to play the game of woke in order to earn brownie points, but today, it’s become one of their greatest liabilities. “It was sold to them as a way to decrease controversy,” Bowyer said. It became “a huge magnet for controversy.” “Little by little, [HRC] moved the goalposts until finally it was bathroom wars, Bud Light branding, and puberty blockers for the children of employees.”

 

The debanking problem is the other half of this story.

 

In the aftermath of January 6th, the Biden administration effectively encouraged major banks to surveil customer transactions without warrants, flagging legal purchases connected to conservative political or religious activity. What followed was a quiet purge. Accounts were frozen whilst others were suddenly closed. “Reputational risk” was then deployed as a pretext to cut off customers whose only offense was their beliefs.

 

The pattern of discrimination primarily hit faith-based organizations, with Bank of America shutting down accounts for Indigenous Advance Ministries and Timothy Two Project International. JPMorgan Chase also canceled the National Committee for Religious Freedom’s account and then demanded donor lists and political endorsement criteria before even discussing reinstatement!

 

Thankfully, President Trump’s executive order drew a much-needed boundary: banking decisions must be based on objective, risk-based criteria and not a customer’s politics, religion, or constitutionally protected affiliations. After two years of direct engagement, Truist updated its service agreement accordingly, formally prohibiting debanking on political grounds. Bowyer says, “It’s a true blessing to see a prohibition on debanking based on ‘political opinions’ come as a fruit of that engagement.” The message, he hopes, is “back to neutral.”

 

“Christians need to get in the game,” Bowyer says. “The problem wasn’t the Biden administration … The problem is you weren’t showing up. …We complain about a process of woke capitalism that we helped create with our absence and neglect.” He is 100% correct.

 

“We complain about a process of woke capitalism that we helped create with our absence and neglect.” Now is the time for Christians to show up as shareholders, investors, and engaged citizens so that the same issue never rears its ugly head.

 

As Bowyer pointed out on The Washington Watch, the shifting in this direction was already underway before Trump’s return to office, and the election merely accelerated a trend already in motion. Some companies, he acknowledged, won’t budge, but they’re the exception, not the rule.

 

His read on the broader moment is unambiguous: “The biggest reverse march through the institutions I’ve ever seen in my life. The ESG and DEI bubble is just collapsing before our eyes.”

 

This isn’t the end of the war, but it is a battle hard fought and won.

Thank you for your support.

If you appreciate the work we do to spread the good news of Jesus Christ, please consider giving a gift to help us continue this work. Maranatha!